Chicago Houses Sold in 2025 for More Than Their Valuations Implied. In West Englewood, Nearly Twice as Much.

We matched 11,854 arms-length 2025 Chicago house sales to their tax-year-2025 valuations. The citywide median valuation implies 81% of what buyers paid; the gap is widest on the South Side, where the 2027 reassessment has the most ground to remeasure.

Chicago houses that sold in 2025 carried official valuations that implied, at the median, 81 percent of what their buyers actually paid. On the Near North Side the two numbers nearly match. In West Englewood, the median house sold for almost twice its implied valuation.

11,854 sales matched to their tax-year-2025 valuations, 11,719 of them mappable to a community area · houses only

An assessment is the Cook County Assessor’s valuation of a property, and it is the number a tax bill’s share is computed from. For houses the county assesses at 10 percent of estimated market value. We took every arms-length Chicago house sale of 2025 — 11,854 of them — and compared each sale price with the same house’s valuation for the 2025 tax year, before any appeal touched it. Multiplying by ten gives an implied market value for comparison, not a price the office ever quoted. A ratio of 100 percent means that implied value matched the buyer’s price. Across the 11,719 sales that map to a community area, the median is 81 percent: valuations run behind the 2025 market. How far behind depends a great deal on where the house is.

Assessor valuation as a share of 2025 sale price Median per community area, houses only; darker means valued closer to what buyers paid — tap or hover an area for its figure under 65%65–75%75–85%85% and up Albany Park: valued at 84.9% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 153 sales)Archer Heights: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (39) — too thin to rateArmour Square: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (26) — too thin to rateAshburn: valued at 76.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 248 sales)Auburn Gresham: valued at 65.6% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 368 sales)Austin: valued at 82.2% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 463 sales)Avalon Park: valued at 74.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 95 sales)Avondale: valued at 80.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 162 sales)Belmont Cragin: valued at 81.1% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 236 sales)Beverly: valued at 86.6% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 153 sales)Bridgeport: valued at 87.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 162 sales)Brighton Park: valued at 78.2% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 134 sales)Burnside: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (25) — too thin to rateCalumet Heights: valued at 66.7% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 132 sales)Chatham: valued at 74.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 215 sales)Chicago Lawn: valued at 69.2% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 236 sales)Clearing: valued at 84.5% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 142 sales)Douglas: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (23) — too thin to rateDunning: valued at 79.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 285 sales)East Garfield Park: valued at 83.5% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 95 sales)East Side: valued at 69.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 90 sales)Edgewater: valued at 81.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 74 sales)Edison Park: valued at 81.3% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 88 sales)Englewood: valued at 64.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 204 sales)Forest Glen: valued at 85.6% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 144 sales)Fuller Park: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (14) — too thin to rateGage Park: valued at 68.7% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 90 sales)Garfield Ridge: valued at 81.9% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 236 sales)Grand Boulevard: valued at 88.2% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 57 sales)Greater Grand Crossing: valued at 71.2% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 235 sales)Hegewisch: valued at 60.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 78 sales)Hermosa: valued at 78.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 65 sales)Humboldt Park: valued at 85.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 258 sales)Hyde Park: valued at 97.5% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 52 sales)Irving Park: valued at 83.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 258 sales)Jefferson Park: valued at 83.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 182 sales)Kenwood: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (45) — too thin to rateLake View: valued at 83.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 220 sales)Lincoln Park: valued at 86.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 260 sales)Lincoln Square: valued at 78.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 115 sales)Logan Square: valued at 79.5% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 335 sales)Loop: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (3) — too thin to rateLower West Side: valued at 83.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 95 sales)McKinley Park: valued at 73.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 90 sales)Montclare: valued at 87.3% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 67 sales)Morgan Park: valued at 80.9% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 174 sales)Mount Greenwood: valued at 82.3% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 159 sales)Near North Side: valued at 99.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 88 sales)Near South Side: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (33) — too thin to rateNear West Side: valued at 89.1% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 90 sales)New City: valued at 70.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 193 sales)North Center: valued at 81.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 190 sales)North Lawndale: valued at 80.7% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 192 sales)North Park: valued at 88.5% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 66 sales)Norwood Park: valued at 84.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 273 sales)Oakland: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (10) — too thin to rateO’Hare: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (29) — too thin to ratePortage Park: valued at 84.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 361 sales)Pullman: valued at 64.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 55 sales)Riverdale: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (12) — too thin to rateRogers Park: valued at 80.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 69 sales)Roseland: valued at 72.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 418 sales)South Chicago: valued at 77.7% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 202 sales)South Deering: valued at 64.9% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 108 sales)South Lawndale: valued at 88.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 128 sales)South Shore: valued at 81.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 213 sales)Uptown: valued at 80.3% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 57 sales)Washington Heights: valued at 77.1% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 247 sales)Washington Park: under 50 usable sales in 2025 (32) — too thin to rateWest Elsdon: valued at 74.0% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 77 sales)West Englewood: valued at 57.5% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 272 sales)West Garfield Park: valued at 81.5% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 92 sales)West Lawn: valued at 73.4% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 130 sales)West Pullman: valued at 72.3% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 304 sales)West Ridge: valued at 81.7% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 197 sales)West Town: valued at 85.7% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 394 sales)Woodlawn: valued at 81.8% of its 2025 sale prices (median, 107 sales)
Where valuations track prices, and where they trail them Chicago’s 77 official community areas. Grey areas had fewer than 50 usable house sales in 2025, too few for a fair median. 135 sales without a mappable location are excluded from the area figures.

The areas valued closest to their prices, and the areas furthest below

Valued closest to their sale pricesshare of price
  • Near North Side88 sales99.4%
  • Hyde Park52 sales97.5%
  • Near West Side90 sales89.1%
  • North Park66 sales88.5%
  • Grand Boulevard57 sales88.2%
Valued furthest below their sale pricesshare of price
  • South Deering108 sales64.9%
  • Englewood204 sales64.4%
  • Pullman55 sales64.0%
  • Hegewisch78 sales60.4%
  • West Englewood272 sales57.5%

The pattern lines up with where prices have moved fastest. Our recorded-sales reporting found South and West Side house prices rising from a low base at some of the fastest rates in the city — Englewood’s median recorded house price, about $25,000 in 2019, reached about $120,000 by 2025 — and assessments are updated on a schedule: Chicago was last reassessed for tax year 2024, so the 2025 valuations mostly reflect the market as the Assessor measured it then. Where prices kept climbing after that measurement, the valuation fell behind the price. West Englewood’s median 2025 buyer paid almost twice the house’s implied valuation; buyers on the Near North Side paid almost exactly the implied value.

What a below-market valuation means at the next reassessment

Within a taxing district, tax shares are relative: a house’s slice of the levy follows its equalized assessed value, after exemptions, against everyone else’s. Before those adjustments enter, a house valued at half its market price starts from a smaller share than a same-priced house valued in full. Chicago’s next citywide reassessment is scheduled for tax year 2027, and reassessment means remeasuring values against recent sales. If prices in the widest-gap areas hold anywhere near their 2025 levels, those are the valuations with the most ground to make up when that remeasurement comes. What any of it does to an individual bill is genuinely unknowable from here — levies, exemptions, equalization, appeals and everyone else’s new values all move at once — and this page makes no bill prediction. It measures the size of the gap the next reassessment will be looking at.

One more piece of context sits beside this map. Our appeal-map reporting found that owners in West Englewood file the fewest assessment appeals per house in the city, and that the appeals they do file win at the city’s highest rate. This page adds a third fact: its valuations sit furthest below its own market. We present the three facts side by side and draw no causal line among them; each is measured independently from county records.

How we counted

  • Sales: the Assessor’s Parcel Sales file (wvhk-k5uv), calendar-2025 sales in Chicago’s eight townships, houses only (classes 2xx, excluding condominiums), keeping only sales the file itself marks arms-length: no duplicate recording of the same sale within 365 days, no sales under $10,000, no excluded deed types, no multi-parcel sales. A parcel genuinely sold twice in 2025 passes those screens as two transactions; 447 rows are such second sales, each counted as its own observation of a price against the same valuation.
  • Valuations: the Assessor’s Assessed Values file (uzyt-m557), tax-year-2025 mailed values — the Assessor’s original figure for each parcel, before any appeal. Every one of the 11,407 sold parcels matched a mailed value. Using pre-appeal values keeps this measurement independent of the appeal behavior we mapped separately.
  • The ratio: ten times the mailed assessed value, divided by the sale price, per the county’s 10 percent assessment level for houses; each area’s figure is the median across its sales, shown only where an area had at least 50 usable sales. The citywide median is computed across the 11,719 sales that map to a community area; 135 without a mappable location are excluded throughout.
  • What the timing means: Chicago’s most recent citywide reassessment was for tax year 2024, so tax-year-2025 mailed values largely carry that measurement forward, while the sales here run through calendar 2025. The gap measured is the one a 2025 buyer actually experienced between price and valuation; it is not a grade of the Assessor’s accuracy as of the earlier date the office was valuing for.
  • As of: both files were retrieved July 27, 2026. The sales file continues to add late-recorded 2025 deeds over time and can be corrected, so a later rerun may show different counts; the committed data snapshot in our repository preserves the exact figures used here.
  • What this is not: a tax bill prediction. Bills depend on levies, exemptions, the state equalization multiplier and everyone else’s values; this page measures valuations against prices and nothing further.

Computed by KCM Desk from Assessor sales and valuation records; published July 27, 2026. If you spot an error, corrections come first.

Moving HereLiving HereCity in MotionNeighborhoods & Suburbs
About · Editorial Policy · Our Data & Methods · Privacy · Terms · Contact
© 2026 Keep Chicagoland Moving · A TAK Marketing, LLC publication · Part of the fabulous Omnishun information systems